Saturday, December 15, 2007

Pseudoschizophreniadvertisement

It's tough to be the advertisee. As raw deals go, it's one of the rawest: on the one hand, as a potential consumer, the advertisee's attention is coveted fiercely, courted endlessly, and hunted ruthlessly; on the other hand, the advertisee's only compensation for his or her attention is the perverse desire to buy the products advertised. The advertisee effectively loses twice: first when his or her attention in taken, and then when he or she rewards the marketer for the theft by buying the client's merchandise.

It would seem a hopelessly exploitative, abusive, and one-sided relationship if not for one thing: every new scheme to steal attention from advertisees begins to wear out the moment it is used. The pop-up ads that seemed clever one moment become hopelessly annoying the next. "Bugs" -- the tiny animated ad-lettes that appear in the corner of a television show to promote another program on the same network -- have stopped enticing audiences and now merely "bug" viewers.

I've always taken comfort in this cycle of marketing innovation and audience desensitization, because it assures me that no matter how advertisers surpass me in wealth, resources, and research, they will be bested forever and helplessly by one thing: my mind and body's capacity for boredom. No matter how hard they try to catch my eye (or my ear), they will inevitably come up against my psychological and corporeal inertia. Think of it as the marketing equivalent of Newton's First Law of Motion: a body at rest will not move until an external marketing force acts upon it, and then that body will get used to that force, return to a state of rest, and fast forward past the commercials.

Note, however, that this law only applies to cases in which the marketing force applied to the advertisee's body is external. It now appears that all this is about to change:



You see that billboard? You see those two boxes that look like loudspeakers on top? Those little boxes were developed by MBAs (Masters of the Black Arts) at Holosonic Research Labs, and what they do in a nutshell is send out a focused beam of ultrasonic waves at frequencies above those of human hearing which then interact with air and surfaces in the beam's path to create audible sound. The result: when you're in the beam's path, it sounds like someone is talking to you from inside your head -- and the people standing a short distance away from you can't hear a thing.

(According to some of the reports on this technology that I've read, any surface struck by the beam is used to help create these audible signals, so the sense that there's a voice in your head might not be far from the truth. On the other hand, as has been pointed out by several readers' comments to this post, this is probably less than a fair characterization of how this technology works, but which circulated nonetheless after initial reports described how those who encountered these "audio spotlights" felt as though the sound was emanating from inside their skulls. See the comments below for more details.)




A few advertisers have begun to experiment with this blatantly evil and obscene technology, but the most prominent is the cable channel A&E, which is using it in conjunction with a billboard in New York to scare the shit out of people in the hopes that this will drum up interest for its television show "Paranormal State." Whether or not this advertising experiment pays off for A&E really is beside the point, because it's the thought that counts, and the thought in this case is unforgivably devious and irresponsible: to make people on the street think they're hearing voices that no one else can hear in order to make them momentarily think that they've gone crazy because they're hearing voices that no one else can hear... which they are.

Make no mistake, though: this Baddie Nomination is not being given to a specific commercial but rather to a new technology, and that's a special honor in and of itself. We tip our hats to you, Holosonic Research Labs, for your bold contribution to a field we're calling "Ad Assault": the science of targeting a stranger's ears without his or her consent to deliver a personal advertisement that his or her neighbors can't hear. Congratulations, HRL! Your exciting technology shows enormous potential--not just for advertisers, but for police and military forces as well! Just think of how, in a few short years, crowds of peaceful political protesters will be dispersed with individually targeted blasts of deafening noise. Imagine the military interrogation techniques that will become possible when your technology is applied to a prisoner who claims to have no intel to offer: we'll see how long he lasts when interrogators can go hyper-Clockwork Orange on him and play Beethoven's 9th as if it was coming from within his own head!

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

could you please tell me how you determined, without a doubt, that the skull is being resonated by the speakers? it sounds like this is the premise of your contention, so i'd like to know what source you used to come to that conclusion...

after googling for about 5 mins regarding the actual technology rather than what's been written about it, likely by people that didn't hear it... i find nothing to back up your concerns. please post the link with what your research has turned up.

thanks.

Anonymous said...

if the technology /*relies*/ on the use of the brain, the skull, or other parts of human anatomy...how then is it able to be recorded in the video which you embedded?

BH said...

With pleasure. My claim about this technology "playing" the human skull was based on a couple of secondary sources, most recently the coverage by WNYC's "On The Media" found here. One of the stories I link to in my original post also cites this description of the technology by International Robotics Inc.:

The Hypersonic Sound Waves travel silently through space, up to 300 feet away, then convert into an instant sound source whatever surface they impact. Amazingly, if you aim this magical device at a person, their head will become a speaker, and they will hear your message "inside" their head....
The sound only becomes apparent to the listener when the traveling sound waves have made impact with a surface, be it material, organic, or human.


Your skepticism is well taken, and I admit that what I wrote about this technology is polemic and half-jokingly alarmist. From what I've read about this technology in its various trade names (such as Sound Beam, Audio Spotlight, Voice to Skull or V2K), it more or less works by sending out a focused beam of ultrasonic waves (at frequencies above the range of human hearing). When these ultrasonic waves interact with air in the target zone and a contact surface, a secondary set of audible sound waves are produced in a confined area.

So you're right -- this technology doesn't necessarily "play" the human body. However, should a person's body appear in the path of the ultrasonic beam, some of the sources I've cited seem to suggest that the body will also serve as a surface against which the audible signal will be partially constructed.

It's quite possible, though, that the technology wouldn't actually interact with the human body that way, and that this business about resonating skulls is just colorful hyperbole that began with some of the initial reporting about these "sound beam" devices. For instance, this is what appeared in Popular Science in 2002:

"Step into the beam and you hear the sound as if it were being generated inside your head. Reflect it off a surface and it sounds like it originated there."

Popular Science goes on to suggest possible applications, including a "sound bullet": "Jack the sound level up to 145 decibels, or 50 times the human threshold of pain," Popular Science helpfully suggests, "and an offshoot of hypersonic sound technology becomes a nonlethal weapon."

So no, my criticism of this technology isn't just about whether or not it uses the human body as a sound-producing surface. Indeed, this "audio spotlight" seems to act on the body no more or less than conventionally produced sound.

In truth, the military and police applications are, for me, somewhat incidental concerns: the idea that sound technology for targeting people might be used to target people militarily is not surprising. My serious criticism has to do with how this technology can target subjects with near-individual specificity in otherwise public places, which suggests a subtle shift in the way we sensually engage with public space.

Consider, for instance, a standard billboard: it may be facing one direction or another, but it doesn't privilege any one person or space. Similarly, anyone speaking in public can expect to be heard by anyone within earshot. This technology, however, introduces the possibility of being targeted -- either by a private commercial or state interest -- in isolation within a crowd. Suddenly your immediate neighbor is not hearing what you're hearing. The audible sense of publicness is now at odds with spatial publicness.

I'm sure that this technology was created with the noblest of intentions (though I'd be willing to bet that some not-so-noble intentions contributed to its research and development). And I bet that there are some really wonderful uses for it. But as a conveyor of advertising messages to individuals in a crowd, it strikes me as something that further isolates people from one another in public for commercial benefit.

BH said...

To the poster who wrote: "if the technology /*relies*/ on the use of the brain, the skull, or other parts of human anatomy...how then is it able to be recorded in the video which you embedded?"

As has been pointed out in another comment, my description leaves much to be desired. I'll edit the original post momentarily to correct these inaccuracies.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for your reply BH. As you correctly point out, the audioSpotlight intereacts with the body in no way differently than anything else which one can hear.

It seems that this was more fully addressed here: http://www.forumopolis.com/showpost.php?p=1895026&postcount=59

I've had a look at the Holosonics site as well as the patents, and find that the audioSpotlight simply interacts with air and its fairly predictable qualities of distortion, and in no way, save for the normal ability to hear sound, requires any cranial resonance.

Thanks.